tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4707067956412102519.post6479256959224340872..comments2019-03-11T00:43:14.467-07:00Comments on Court No. 83: Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859: libel on twitterCourt No. 83http://www.blogger.com/profile/02744727165331309889noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4707067956412102519.post-49962213399844985932012-03-27T00:15:11.107-07:002012-03-27T00:15:11.107-07:00And the substantive case has come to court - and M...And the substantive case has come to court - and Mr Cairns won. Mr Modi could not provide any evidence to back up his allegations. Damages are just under six figures, increased because of the aggressive legal tactics used by Modi's brief, and these are subject to appeal. The real shocker is the costs; why has this cost £400k to bring to Court? If Mr Modi could provide no evidence, it should have been dealt with almost summarily...Court No. 83https://www.blogger.com/profile/02744727165331309889noreply@blogger.com